Criminal names - 1214/18

Date Responded 21 December 2018

Provision of information held by Northumbria Police made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the 'Act')

As you may be aware the purpose of the Act is to allow a general right of access to information held at the time of a request, by a Public Authority (including the Police), subject to certain limitations and exemptions.

You asked:

Under the Freedom of Information Act I request the following information for the years 2015-2018 inclusive:

a) The 10 most common first names of criminals.

b) The 10 most common first names of those convicted of:

  1. Assault
  2. Fraud
  3. Rape
  4. Sexual assault
  5. Murder
  6. Robbery
  7. Public disorder
  8. Theft
  9. Drink driving

I would like this information for male and females.

In Response:

We have now had the opportunity to fully consider your request and I provide a response for your attention.

Following receipt of your request, searches were conducted with the Corporate Development Department of Northumbria Police. I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by Northumbria Police however cannot be disclosed for the following reasons.

This information is not held in a format that allows us to extract down to the level you are seeking within the permitted time constraint.

For each arrest record there may be multiple disposals against different offences.  We would need to review the multiple disposals to decide which  offence category to allocate it to.  For 2018 alone in excess of 10,000 records would require manual review.  Even at a conservative estimate of 3 minutes per record, which we have considered as reasonable, we have estimated that to extract this information would take over 500 hours, therefore Section 12(1) of the Freedom of Information Act would apply. This section does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimated that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit of 18 hours, equating to £450.00

You should consider this to be a refusal notice under Section 17 of the Act for your request.

When applying Section 12 exemption our duty to assist under Section 16 of the Act would normally entail that we contact you to determine whether it is possible to refine the scope of your request to bring it within the cost limits. However, from the information we have outlined above I see no reasonable way in which we can do so.

back to top